Proof Hub

Work sample 02 · Operating underwriting

15-Year OHFA
Cash Flow & DSCR

A sanitized hard-debt coverage schedule that tests annual performance, separates mechanical deferred-fee capacity from a proven waterfall, and exposes the post-abatement cliff.

Governing decision

Hard-debt coverage passes. Long-tail risk remains open.

The 15-year schedule supports the selected permanent debt. The Year-16 post-abatement DSCR falls to approximately 0.43x.

Selected permanent debt $3,389,040 Below Year-1 debt ceiling
Year-1 hard DSCR 1.34x Formula-linked test
15-year average DSCR 1.38x Peak approximately 1.40x
Mechanical DDF reach Year 11 Waterfall evidence still open
Year-16 post-abatement 0.43x Fail cliff

What the model does

Test coverage without overstating cash availability.

The schedule preserves the distinction between hard-debt DSCR and cash actually available to repay deferred developer fee. It can show mechanical capacity while withholding a final DDF conclusion until the partnership and soft-debt waterfall is documented.

15-year cash flow tab · Annual hard-debt coverage and cash-capacity controls

Headline findings

Passing years can still conceal a structural cliff.

The selected permanent debt remains within the modeled hard-debt controls for the 15-year period. The independent Year-16 test shows why the abatement expiration belongs in the decision, not in a footnote.

Hard-debt screen PASS

Year-1, annual minimum, and 15-year average controls are satisfied.

DDF capacity MECHANICAL ONLY

$1,265,622 of cumulative modeled capacity versus $883,500 of DDF; actual waterfall remains open.

Post-abatement FAIL CLIFF

Modeled Year-16 NOI is approximately $96,393 and hard DSCR approximately 0.43x.

Assumptions tab · Inputs, governing controls, sources, and evidence gate

Year 15 ~1.40x Abatement benefit modeled
Year 16 ~0.43x Post-abatement stress

Live-deal application

Where this becomes useful to a developer.

The model can sit behind debt sizing, investor and lender review, funding applications, and closing updates while preserving the difference between a screening conclusion and a documented transaction conclusion.

Propose this workstream
Work-sample boundary

Independent, sanitized predevelopment analysis prepared by John Kirkwood Jr. This model is a screening and demonstration tool, not an agency approval, lender underwriting, investor commitment, or representation of a closed transaction.